On the first question, I have to disagree. Poker is often referred to as a long game, which is most obvious in cash game settings. Even if you visit your local poker room a few days a week, the results of each session are less important if you’re playing $1 or $2 No Limit Hold’em. What matters is how successful I am overall in the long run.

However, the same is true for tournaments. Let’s say your poker room hosts a re-entry tournament every Tuesday night. Same purchase, same structure and more or less the same field every week.

When you think about it, what difference would it make if you played the tournament again tonight or came back next Tuesday to play later? How do players love him because he has no money to get back in? The difference between a player who does not re-enter and another player who re-enters once a week on average is not that the player who re-enters has a financial advantage. That is, one of them plays 40-50 discs a year and the remaining 80-100 discs access the bonus138 online gaming agent.

If they have the same skill level, they will get the same rate of return on investment. However, returning players have no advantage over players who do not or cannot return. Yes, repeaters are more likely to win money tonight and win today’s tournaments. In this example, you are twice as likely to do so. But they also spent twice as much money on that profit. After all, if these two players have the same skill level, they will win or lose the same amount each game. Dollars invested in access.

Leave a Reply